Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Krumich vs Timo Stodder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krumich vs Stodder analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Krumich vs Timo Stodder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krumich 1 - 1 Stodder
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krumich has won 45.95% of points on their second serve, while Stodder has won 46.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krumich, in recent form, has won 54.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stodder has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.18% and 29.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krumich has saved 62.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stodder has saved 52.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krumich has won 65.57% of matches played (W/L 40/ 21), with Stodder winning 55.17% (W/L 32/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krumich has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 17/ 15). Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Krumich has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 36/ 14), where as Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krumich winning 1 times and Stodder being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krumich winning 2 and Stodder winning 3. The last match between Krumich and Stodder was at the M25 Jablonec nad Nisou, 02-09-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Martin Krumich getting the victory 7-6(1) 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krumich and Stodder have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krumich winning 1 times and Stodder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krumich winning 1, and Stodder 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krumich has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.11 while Stodder has played against players with an average rank of 214.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krumich has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stodder has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krumich has converted 39.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stodder has converted 52.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
369
Rank
369
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
325
Rank
257
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
56% (114-89)
Career Total W/L
65% (196-106)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Krumich | Timo Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 19 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:30 | 1:53:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (79/147) | 55% (74/134) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (51/79) | 68% (50/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (35/68) | 65% (39/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (45/134) | 41% (61/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Martin Krumich
Player
Timo Stodder
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Martin Krumich
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Krumich | Timo Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (17/26) | 36% (9/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (205/218) | 45% (109/135) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 39% (7/11) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:1 | 1:38:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 225.32 | 81.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (765/1383) | 62% (490/791) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (469/765) | 61% (300/490) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (284/618) | 46% (139/301) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (73/183) | 53% (31/59) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (641/1414) | 39% (310/792) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 42% (5/7) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 40% (4/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Martin Krumich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
118)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
13
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Martin Krumich
48%
(
50 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Michael Vrbensky
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Martin Krumich
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Yaroslav Demin
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Martin Krumich
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Timo Stodder
43%
(
32 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Krumich Vs Stodder Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
